SOLAR INERTIAL MOTION
Did you even know that the Sun moves in a spiral in relation to the planets of the Solar System? That it is NOT static? And that this is the primary driver for short to medium term climate change?
Newton knew this, why do they no longer teach this at school or University?
NEWTON (1687) showed that the sun is engaged in continual motion around the centre of mass of the solar system (i.e. the barycentre) as a result of the gravitational force exerted by the planets, especially Jupiter and Saturn. He came to this conclusion analytically (not by observation) by working through the consequences of his law of gravitation. The sun is in free-fall around the barycentre as a result of planetary gravitational force.
The sun orbits the barycentre inside a circular area which itself is just over two solar diameters in diameter. This might be negligible for the solar system but it is highly significant in relation to the size and nature of the sun. Amongst other things, the sun may be travelling through its own electromagnetic fields during various stages of its journey. Unlike planetary orbits around the barycentre, the sun’s orbit around the barycentre differs greatly from orbit to orbit. The general form of the sun’s barycentric orbit is an epitrochoid, a big circle continuous with a little ring nestling asymmetrically inside it.
At one phase, the orbit is nearly circular, almost two solar diameters in diameter. At another phase, the Sun is impelled on a backward, or retrograde, journey in which it undergoes a tight loop-the-loop, crossing over its own path in a loop that is less than one solar radius. The epitrochoid’s asymmetric ring arises from the sun undergoing the retrograde loop-the-loop. No alignment of the planets in relation to the Sun repeats itself exactly, because the solar system is chaotic, containing intrinsic randomness.
As a result, no two epitrochoid-shaped solar orbits are the same. Nevertheless, they can be classified into eight distinctive patterns, each of about 179 years’ duration, which is also the time taken for the planets to occupy approximately the same positions again relative to each other and the sun. In this time the sun completes about nine orbits, or one planetary cycle.
Most scientists do NOT understand this. They are lost behind the CO2 false science.
Richard Mackey: Rhodes Fairbridge and the idea that the solar system regulates the Earth’s climate
December 2007Journal of Coastal Research 50(sp1):955-968
DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI50-176.1
Our comment
Everything is cyclical, including human levels of consciousness (karma), peoples, races, continents, earthquakes, and catastrophes. This was standard knowledge in the ancient world and was reintroduced to the West 130 years ago by spiritual teachers like Helena Blavatsky, thus breaking the spiral of silence.
However, it is still not common knowledge, not even expert scientific knowledge. Astrologists understand this better. Especially since Helena Blavatsky, in her famous (but misunderstood) “The Secret Doctrine” of 1888, issued a clear warning that there was a danger the continent of Europe could be prematurely destroyed by human activity, like Atlantis before it. This was not prophecy, but rather the precise knowledge of karmic cycles, and we are “now” in the space-time spiral at the same level and thus in the same quality of time (an astrological term!) as back then.
Newton knew this, as he was an astrologer as well as a kabbalist and occultist. Experts say, that 80 percent of his still unpublished manuscripts deal with the occult.
Karma returns cyclically (law of conservation of energy), and whether and how we survive it depends on our spiritual progress. It’s also a very practical problem; mental counterforces must be weighed on the scales so that the side burdened with karmic baggage doesn’t tip over. Those who, due to their spiritual blindness, hinder humanity’s spiritual development, would run to the ends of the earth if they understood what they were doing.
But they don’t know what they’re doing because they live in self-imposed immaturity (Kant) and don’t recognize God (karma in one aspect) being-in-and-for-themselves (Hegel). They lack the joy of the “beautiful spark of divinity” (Schiller, Beethoven) to recognize that two souls dwell within their breast (Goethe), the good one and the evil one, wrestling with each other every day. Two animals; it depends on which one you feed (old Native American proverb).
Analogous to Rhodes Fairbridge’s theory of cyclical solar forces in relation to climate, connections also exist with influenza, as Zollikofer, Webster, Ruhemann, and Tapping had already recognized. It should be clear to any reasonable person, that therefore one cannot be vaccinated against it, because the fictitious influenza virus exists only as a business model of corrupt virologists and the power groups that protect them, but not in reality [1].
Note
[1] Here we mean the German “Wirklichkeit” (objective) as distinct from the German “Realität” (subjective), a philosophical distinction not made in the English language.